Stunted by DRM

Digital Rights Management (DRM) has stunted my love affair of the ebook.

If I buy a book, or an album, or a movie, I will do what I believe most people will do with such items: enjoy them and then pass them on in some manner. Sometimes I am an impulse buyer of books (not that any of you all have ever suffered from this) and I will pick up a hardback or paperback because I like the cover, the sound of the author’s name, the genre, or because it is the perfect size for my remaining empty pocket in my bookbag.

However, I have not had this impulse with ebooks, mostly because they are difficult to share. Once I’ve read a book, I like to have options. A few remain on my shelves forever, but most get passed on to friends, coworkers, neighbors, my favorite library and a few get sold or traded in for bookstore credit.

Let me be clear: I do not condone ebook piracy. I believe DRM was created to protect the authors and publishers, who deserve to get paid for their work. However, by and large, this has backfired. This is primarily for two reasons: 1) Those who wish to circumvent the law for nefarious reasons will always find a way – DRM or not, they will exploit your electronic material; 2) Those who want to respect the reasons behind the DRM are constrained by it because DRM reduces the number of things I can legally do with MY property (lending it out for a lengthy time, selling it, donating it) – DRM makes it hard to justify buying a book I can’t pass on, especially one by an author I haven’t read before.

If the publishers are going to ‘lawfully’ reduce the uses of my property, then the product needs to be damn good – no typos, perfect formatting, multiple fonts, maps, color, ability to use on multiple devices, coverart, linked table of contents and indices. In short, your ebook needs to meet the highest quality if you expect me to pay good money for an item that I and I alone will get to enjoy. If such quality was rampant throughout the ebook market (which it is currently not), I would buy a few more a year. However, that still leaves the issue of lack of versatility.

The great thing about hardbacks and paperbacks is they keep selling the author. They circulate around in used bookstores, left at hotels, passed from friend to friend. Some of my greatest book love affairs started this way – Jacqueline Carey, Jim Butcher, Guy Gavriel Kay. They were all used paper books that were passed to me and now I own nearly every book they have published. They sit on my forever shelf. Ebooks could act the same way.

Last year, a friend of mine gave me an ecopy of his ebook Warchild by Karrin Lowachee, an author I had never heard of but whose book he had greatly enjoyed. Another book love affair was born. Now I own all her books in paper version and they are the latest addition to my Eternal Bookshelf. Did my friend break the DRM to provide a single copy to me? Probably. Did he profit from doing that? No, other than stimulating conversation over a shared book. Did the author and publisher profit? Yes! Twice over – I bought the paper books, read them, raved about them, and my friend went on to by the rest of her books also.

I read a lot – perhaps 150-200 books per year. I have two ereaders because I like the ease of transporting a minilibrary around with me. Most of those ebooks are from copyright free sites, like Project Gutenberg. With TOR’s announcement this past week of going DRM free, I can see a near future where my ereaders will have more mainstream ebooks. I have noticed other publishers going DRM free and Kindle started their lending program this year also. Perhaps impulse ebook buying will soon be acceptable.

About nrlymrtl

DabofDarkness.com; Darkcargo.com; Round Table Farms (nrlymrtl.wordpress.com) organic farming; reading scifi/fantasy, historical fiction, mysteries; cooking good stuff

5 thoughts on “Stunted by DRM

  1. So I wrote this rediculously long response, and then realized maybe I should just do a blog post on a similar topic.

    I agree 100% with everything you said. DRM only does one thing well: make people want to break DRM. Booklovers love books, and we love to SHARE those books. we lend our stuff to our friends, use the public library, trade stuff back to the used bookstore, lend dog-eared and spine-busted copies of out of print stuff all over the place. we know how media mail works for goodness sake!

    I can only hope that other pubs will take a hint from Tor and Cory Doctorow, and go DRM free. I can’t tell you how many titles I went on to purchase because I got the book from the library or borrowed it from a friend first. If I had to pay full retail for every title I ever read, this would be a hobby I couldn’t afford.

    • TOR’s decision was a big break from the very conservative “big six” publishing. (by conservative, I mean afraid of change)

      Small presses and individuals have been DRM free for quite a while.

      Another important change that this is going to instigate is the break away from Amazon.

    • Do you think that once upon a time when the photocopier was invented, publishers were seriously worried that folks would photocopy their books in quantity in order to make profit?

      I have only ever met 1 dude who had several books he had photocopied, for his personal use. He wasn’t all there.

      So perhaps in another 5-10 years, people will look back on this long debate on DRM and laugh, wondering why folks would ever a) go to the time to make crap ecopies and try to sell them and b) that a huge number of folks would by the crap ecopies.

  2. I fully agree with you all, and hope that you are right about improvements ahead.

    But one unfortunate difference between tree books and ebooks, at least in the minds of Amazon and likely some other ebook purveyors, is that the contract is not a sale. It is a lease, much like the lease of software, and can therefore be limited by terms that they specify for their own benefit.

    Some, I fear, will never abandon that prerogative until it ceases to be profitable to them or important to their view of their rights.

    Here’s hoping I’m wrong about that.

    • The higher the quality of the product, the more difficult to replicate cheaply. I am hoping that the ebook publishers soon realize that a quality product is there best defense against piracy.

      If publishers truly start pushing that ebooks are like software and therefore I have leased all these ebooks, then I will use my ereaders to read only copyright free ebooks. Period. I bought this ebook, for a price at which I could have a well copyedited paperbook, and if the law does not support my right to treat it as my property, then ebooks have a very short future indeed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s