Rate My Squeamishness

The Roasted Squash Seed Rating System

Rating systems make me squeamish. You see them everywhere – Amazon, Goodreads, movie review sites, etc. Specifically, the ones on book review sites make me squirm a bit.

False Sense of Reality in Rating Systems

  • My reading tastes do not equal everyone else’s reading tastes
  • Folks sometimes poopoo a book because a favorite character died and not because of technical flaws
  • Folks rate the book without reading it
  • Naughty folks on purposely rate a book high as a favor to the author or in exchange for similar favor
  • Some readers are just idiots and don’t realize that Simon Green is the epitome of Space Opera

How do I know that my 5 stars on Hero of Ages by Brandon Sanderson means the same thing to everyone? I also give 5 stars to the Tiffany Aching series by Terry Pratchett and to Bonk by Mary Roach. These are all very different books, yet they do what I expect of them to the highest quality (dark epic fantasy, twisted humor, investigative journalism nonfiction). I have no qualms at all giving these books 5 stars, but what does that mean to other folks?

I love Terry Pratchett’s work, but can’t seem to get into Piers Anthony – yet both authors have long-running series (Discworld and Xanth) in the same field and are held up as classics of that genre. I don’t read a whole lot of humor fantasy because I often find it full of cliches and one book after another can get to be redundant. I’m more of a dark fantasy or series scifi nut, yet I do happen to like Pratchett.

Even within an author’s repertoire you can have a variety of ratings by one person. For instance, Pillars of the Earth and World without End by Ken Follett are two of my favorite historical fiction novels of all time. Follett’s other books, like Whiteout and Hammer of Eden, are great for modern-day thriller/action fiction but I wouldn’t put 5 stars on them because I know he has more to give. Yet, if I had not read his two biggies, I would give his others book 5 stars because they are really good compared to other stuff in the same subset genre.

So, can you see my quandary over using a rating system? A simple number rating system doesn’t tell the browser looking for the next book to read anything useful. The stars have been overused and the book hunter must now go back to the Middle Ages way of book recommendations – books traded in secret among book connoisseurs or simply trusting your own hunter instincts in that dark alley book store.

Or you can trust your friends here at Darkcargo and other (non-paid) book bloggers to keep providing recommendations.

About these ads

About nrlymrtl

DabofDarkness.com; Darkcargo.com; Round Table Farms (nrlymrtl.wordpress.com) organic farming; reading scifi/fantasy, historical fiction, mysteries; cooking good stuff

8 thoughts on “Rate My Squeamishness

  1. I must admit that I’m not really into ratings. When I first started my blog I used to give books an A or B, etc, however, I pretty soon realised that I had no particular basis on which to give the grades and when I looked back I might have given something an A and yet realised that the book I’d just read was far superior so then what to do? These days I don’t rate I just hope that my enthusiasm will come across more for some books than others. To be fair, I don’t really have a lot of negative reviews but that’s mainly because if I’m not enjoying a book I stop reading – and it always seems a bit unfair to review something you haven’t finished.
    Lynn :D

    • I use to do the same thing! I would rate something high, only to read something superior the next month. Sigh… I use to use the stars religiously, but the more I read, the more I realized that a simple number rating system doesn’t capture what I want people to know about the book. And I finally stopped taking it seriously.

      • ” but the more I read, the more I realized that a simple number rating system doesn’t capture what I want people to know about the book.”

        yes! that, exactly! when I first started blogging I’d rate things one to five stars, or something like that. but the worst ever China Mieville book is better than the best crappy-author’s-name-here, so do i give the Mieville I didn’t care for only 3 stars, but the crappy book by the person who tried really, really hard 4 stars? and how do I rate it if the premise was brilliant but I didn’t buy into the characters, or if I loved the characters, but the prose was choppy and weird? it kills me to have to rate something on Amazon.

        • Yeah. I like using goodreads, and I have learned not to get too wrapped around the axle about the stars. People truly interested in the book or in my reviews will read the text. Hopefully.

  2. Just today I realized another problem with “ratings” when looking at Goodreads for something. My reaction to lower ratings is “Obviously this book was too complicated for this stupid reader.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s